controversy
Historicity of Jesus
Also known as Historical Jesus existence
undated
Scholarly consensus that Jesus of Nazareth existed, based on Paul's letters, the gospels and Josephus and Tacitus; what can be known about him remains debated.
Wikipedia extract
The historicity of Jesus is the debate "on the fringes of scholarship" and in popular culture regarding whether Jesus historically existed or was a purely mythological figure. Mainstream New Testament scholarship ignores the non-existence hypothesis and its arguments, as the question of historicity was settled in scholarship in the early 20th century, and the consensus among modern scholars is that Jesus of Nazareth existed in the Herodian Kingdom of Judea and the subsequent Herodian tetrarchy in the 1st century AD, upon whose life and teachings Christianity was later constructed. However, scholars distinguish between the 'Christ of faith' as presented in the New Testament and the subsequent Christian theology, and a minimal 'Jesus of history', about whom almost nothing can be known.
CC BY-SA 4.0, Wikipedia contributors. Source page
Sources
- Historicity of Jesus · Wikipedia contributorsAccessed 2026-11-12 · CC BY-SA 4.0
- Wikidata Q13588125 · Wikidata contributorsAccessed 2026-11-12 · CC0 1.0
- Catholic Encyclopedia (1907-1912) article · Various (Catholic Encyclopedia)Accessed 2026-11-12 · 1907-1912 text public domain in the US; dated and confessional, use for history of reception
Authority files
- Q13588125
- Library of Congress sh85070029
- Catholic Encyclopedia 08375a
Related
- Christ myth theory · controversy
- Did Jesus Exist? · book
- Bart D. Ehrman · scholar
modern-scholarly-debate · historical-jesus