Skip to content

Research atlas for early Christianity. Claims are tagged attested, traditional, or disputed. Copyrighted full texts, including CCEL editions, are not included.

controversy

Historicity of Jesus

Also known as Historical Jesus existence

undated

Scholarly consensus that Jesus of Nazareth existed, based on Paul's letters, the gospels and Josephus and Tacitus; what can be known about him remains debated.

Wikipedia extract

The historicity of Jesus is the debate "on the fringes of scholarship" and in popular culture regarding whether Jesus historically existed or was a purely mythological figure. Mainstream New Testament scholarship ignores the non-existence hypothesis and its arguments, as the question of historicity was settled in scholarship in the early 20th century, and the consensus among modern scholars is that Jesus of Nazareth existed in the Herodian Kingdom of Judea and the subsequent Herodian tetrarchy in the 1st century AD, upon whose life and teachings Christianity was later constructed. However, scholars distinguish between the 'Christ of faith' as presented in the New Testament and the subsequent Christian theology, and a minimal 'Jesus of history', about whom almost nothing can be known.

CC BY-SA 4.0, Wikipedia contributors. Source page

Sources

Authority files

Related

modern-scholarly-debate · historical-jesus

Historicity of Jesus · DeChurched Atlas