Pistis Sophia
Acquisition/file id pg-76266 · group pistis-sophia · reviewed work id not assigned
These three identities are not the same, and none of them is a legacy Jesus DeChurched work id. Legacy ids stay links. No year was inferred from the catalog prose.
Text from this record is not in private search. Reconciliation says not to reimport it.
Rights
Status recorded by Sage: public_domain_US
Distribution: not-approved-for-public-file-distribution
Embedding: not-approved
Expert verification: not-claimed
Bytes
Original file: not_supplied. Declared sha256 9c0b7cda25cce5f1cdd6c35147809440308a2faa2523471b4198879411f334e9 · 694996 bytes.
Derived text: absent.
Rights-evidence snapshot: absent.
Dates, kept as written
- Composition: Approximately 3rd–4th century CE; debated — provisional broad range, requires modern scholarly verification
- Manuscript: Not verified for this edition; multiple textual witnesses may underlie the translation — unknown
- Translation or imprint text: London: Society for Promoting Christian Knowledge, 1924. — source imprint if catalog provides it; not the PG release date; otherwise unknown
Witness ids supplied: 0. Invented witnesses: 0. Ancient citation: none recorded.
Legacy ids
- pistis-sophia
Limits
- importer. Original bytes were not in this handoff. The declared sha256 and byte length are stored as declarations and were not verified.
- importer. public_domain_US is a United States public-domain statement from the catalog evidence. It is not a worldwide license and it does not approve public file distribution.
Import blockers
- Reconciliation says this edition is already in the Jesus DeChurched catalog. Provenance is kept. Text is not reimported or indexed.
Sources
https://www.gutenberg.org/cache/epub/76266/pg76266.txt
Retrieved: 2026-11-07T17:27:42.644322-06:00
Edition statement: ["London: Society for Promoting Christian Knowledge, 1924."]
- Downloaded source is a born-digital transcription, not a scan or ancient original.
- Publisher summaries/19th-century introductions are not contemporary expert verification. Textual assertions, miracles, authorship and historical events are not independently corroborated by ingestion.
- Composition/reception ranges are provisional orientation; no expert approval is claimed.